Search for: "Snapple Beverage Corp." Results 1 - 20 of 30
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2011, 9:25 am by Frank Hernandez
The Southern District of New York recently granted summary judgment in favor of Snapple Beverage Corp in a case that challenged Snapple's use of the phrase "all natural" on the labeling for its beverages. [read post]
20 May 2010, 5:55 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Snapple Beverage Corp., 2010 WL 1980208 (E.D. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 2:23 pm
Snapple Beverage Corp. will be reported at CCH Advertising Law Guide ¶64,116. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 6:47 am
Snapple Beverage Corp., -- F.3d - (3d Cir. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 9:22 am
Snapple Beverage Corp., reversing the district court and reinstating the state law putative class claims for consumer fraud and breach of warranty for use of the term “all natural” despite the inclusion of high fructose corn syrup (HFCS) (though the court noted that the manufacturer no longer uses HFCS in its products). [read post]
15 Aug 2009, 12:48 pm
Snapple Beverage Corp., No. 08-3060 (3d Cir. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 1:13 am
Snapple Beverage Corp. that a lower court erred in tossing the suit on the grounds that state-law consumer claims are pre-empted by the Food and Drug Administration's labeling regulations. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 10:33 pm by Gretchen Goetz
Pepper Snapple Corp. at $1.8 million, Red Bull at $140,000 and Sunny Delight at $39,000. [read post]
15 Mar 2022, 6:36 pm by Sean Wajert
Snapple Beverage Corp., No. 20-CV-04181-JST, 2021 WL 6754525 (N.D. [read post]